6.6 KiB
| created | path | project | status | tags | type | updated | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-10 | Sources/Homelab | trellis-mcp | active |
|
project-plan | 2026-05-10 |
Goal
Build an MCP server (trellis) that captures and resumes long-running threads of work across artificial conversation boundaries. The unit is a thread — a logical work effort that may span multiple chat sessions over days or weeks. Pause/resume verbs let you switch contexts without losing state.
Solves the "where exactly did we leave the Traefik debugging" problem. Memory is too lossy; chat history finds old conversations but doesn't restore working state. Trellis sits between them: synthesized state per thread, on demand.
Locked Decisions
Three-layer model — keep these separate, none should swallow another's job:
- CLAUDE.md / LOVEBUG.md = instructions (how to behave)
- Trellis threads = record (where we are in the doing)
- Memory / vault = lessons and outcomes (what we learned, what we built)
Naming — trellis. Garden-themed, fits the brand world, metaphor maps cleanly (persistent structure things grow on, you keep returning to it).
Deployment — separate MCP server, not folded into herby-dev. Different scope: herby-dev is your knowledge management, trellis is cross-cutting infrastructure usable from any agent context. Same deployment pattern as herby-dev: Cloudflare Tunnel, FastMCP, Authentik in front. Hostname trellis.herbylab.dev.
Storage — Postgres on the existing instance. Database trellis, schema trellis. Schema namespace makes future consolidation into a single database trivial.
Schema shape — four tables, append-only events log:
threads— one row per named thread (slug, topic, goal, status, parent_id for forks)tags— separate table with DB-level normalization (lowercase, dash-separated, regex-checked)thread_tags— join tableevents— append-only log (started, checkpoint, status_change, fork, metadata_change)
Checkpoint payload is freeform markdown. The agent synthesizes whatever shape fits the thread (current state, decisions, open questions, next steps) — structure not enforced at the DB level.
Tool surface (v1) — seven tools, all suffixed with _thread:
start_thread— creates row, writesstartedeventpause_thread— writescheckpointevent, requires state payloadresume_thread— reads thread + latest checkpoint (no write)get_thread— read-only inspection, optional full event historylist_threads— filtered summary viewfork_thread— new thread row with parent_id, fork event on parentupdate_thread— mutates thread fields, writes metadata_change/status_change event
Lifecycle is prompt-driven — system does nothing autonomously. No background jobs, no auto-abandon, no reminders. Threads exist and persist until you explicitly act on them.
Active context lives in the harness, not the DB — pause is a signal to the harness ("save and switch"); the DB just stores the trail. One active thread at a time in any given chat session is the harness's concern; the DB doesn't care how many threads are in flight.
Open Items
- Postgres deployment shape — LXC vs Docker, fresh instance vs reusing existing
- Migration tooling — Alembic, plain SQL files, or simpler
- Tunnel + Authentik setup for
trellis.herbylab.dev(parallels herby-dev work) - Server framework — presumably FastMCP + Python to match herby-dev, confirm at build time
- First-run question: when trellis is operational, the trellis build itself becomes the first thread; paste design state from this project plan as the initial checkpoint
Phases
Phase 1 — Infrastructure
- Postgres instance available with
trellisdatabase andtrellisschema - Cloudflare Tunnel hostname
trellis.herbylab.dev - Authentik application + provider for trellis
- Repo
trellis-mcpscaffolded
Phase 2 — Schema and migrations
- Apply v1 schema (threads, tags, thread_tags, events)
- Verify CHECK constraints (status enum, tag normalization regex)
- Verify GIN/btree indexes resolve the resume-by-slug hot path
Phase 3 — Tool implementation
start_thread,pause_thread,resume_thread(the core loop)get_thread,list_threads(read paths)fork_thread,update_thread(mutation paths)- Tag normalization in tool layer with clear errors before DB constraint fires
Phase 4 — Wire-up and first use
- Connect from desktop Claude, mobile Claude, Claude Code, Lovebug
- Bootstrap: file the trellis build itself as the first thread
- Iterate based on real use — payload shape, missing affordances, etc.
Notes
Deferred to v2:
- Multi-agent / non-Claude support
- Auto-thread for unnamed conversations
- Auto-status changes (abandon after N days, surfacing stale threads, etc.)
- Read patterns beyond resume-by-name: date ranges, full-text search, decision timelines, fork trees
- Fork merging
- Soft delete / archival
- Tag metadata (description, color)
- Transcript path as a real column (Claude Code transcripts at
~/.claude/projects/) - A
resumedevent kind if telemetry on resumes proves useful
Design principles that drove the shape:
- Append-only in spirit — historical information isn't adjusted, only added to. Even fields that look mutable (current state, next steps) are superseded by newer events rather than rewritten. The thread row reflects current state; events tell you how it got there.
- Coarse event grain — about session-level state ("we paused here, this is what we knew"), not per-interaction ("decision added"). The unit is the checkpoint, not the keystroke.
- Pause = save-and-switch action, not a status — every thread that isn't actively being worked on is implicitly paused. No separate "paused" status needed.
- Trigger is naming — short topical Q&A doesn't need a thread. Lifting to trellis happens when you explicitly say "start a thread called X."
Schema-namespacing rationale — putting trellis tables in a trellis schema (even inside its own database) costs nothing now and makes any future merge into another database a no-op. Connection sets search_path so queries don't qualify table names.
Why two MCPs instead of one — herby-dev is your knowledge management, scoped to your homelab. Trellis is cross-cutting infrastructure usable from any agent context. Folding them couples unrelated concerns; deployment overhead of a second MCP is low given herby-dev established the pattern.
Why separate tags table — preference for normalization upfront. Array column would work for v1 but you know you'll end up at a join table eventually, so start there.